The stereo upgrade is outstanding and the climate system is also very easy to use. The rest of the interionic is very nicely done and competes well with the best of the class. I'm 6'4" and must actually slide the front seat up a little to get comfortable. The 2.0 liter's performance and smoothness matched the V-6s we tested in the Camry and Accord and far out performed the 2.5 4cyl in the Mazda 6. During our break-in drive we went over several very icy passes and this AWD system out performed the Subaru's we have owned actually pulling us around corners. It is very solid and the intelligent AWD results handling on par or better then anything test drove. We have driven this car about 1000 miles so far and love it. After running some quick numbers the additional cost for gas will only cost us about $25 per mouth, not much to pay for the power of the 2.0 liter and the safety of AWD.įord was really ready to deal and we paid about $8,000 below the MSRP. We recognized that we would take a significant hit in MPG,( I own a 2013 F-150 with an eco-boost and have yet to meet the advertised MPG). We then test drove 2.0 liter with … AWD and immediately realized that it matched the Mazda in handling and looks. However after receiving a sudden snow storm here in Montana we both agreed that AWD would be a must. After testing and ranking all available midsized sedans in this class in order to replace my wife's 2013 Subaru Impreza we chose the a 2016 Fusion 2.0 liter AWD This was not my 1st choose as I preferred the Mazda 6 GT for it's MPG, handling, and looks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |